Obamacare Architect: Abortion’s a ‘Social Good’ That Gets Rid of ‘Marginal Children’

Breitbart has uncovered another scandalous Obamacare fact. The deceitful Architect of Obamacare, Jonathan Gruber, believes in aborting “marginal children.” In a paper titled, ABORTION LEGALIZATION AND CHILD LIVING, Gruber claims abortion is a “social good” in that it reduces the number of “marginal children.”

When he says that, he means the urban poor whom he believes will only commit crimes and collect welfare if they are allowed to be born.

The protest riots in Ferguson and New York City should be directed at leftists like Gruber who want to abort minority children in a wholesale act of genocide.

Gruber co-authored the paper in the 1990’s. In it he writes about the $14 billion in welfare benefit savings and the lowered crime rates that will result when the babies are not born in poor neighborhoods, because that’s what it is all about for the liberal.

It’s not about the people, though leftists appear to want to give endless welfare to everyone. It’s really about particularly eliminating “growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of,” as Justice Ginsberg said in a New York Times interview a few years back. She was describing the real purpose of Roe v. Wade at the time which was to control population growth.

Ginsberg has also said, “It makes no sense as a national policy to promote birth only among poor people.”

They’ve been very successful in their mission among blacks and Hispanics. On average, 1,876 black babies are aborted every day in the United States. In NYC, a liberal bastion, more black babies were killed in 2012 than were born, considerably more.

Hispanic children are being aborted at the rate of 31% of births. Black and Hispanic abortions together comprise 73% of the abortions in NYC, the abortion capital of the United States.

This is the arrogant liberal mindset – genocide to keep the population of poor down is good practice because they will only commit crimes and go on welfare. It’s good Dr. Carson’s mother didn’t agree with that sentiment.

In the paper, Gruber et al claim that “if women use abortion to avoid bearing children into adverse circumstances, positive selection would result:…the living circumstances of the marginal child are not as good as the average child, so that increased abortion access will raise average living standards of the children who are born.”