Fight or flight: The public's response to terror at the movies



fightI saw the new Batman movie over the weekend, and on the way into the movie  theater, I saw  police officers standing at the entrance. They were a  reminder that it was not business as usual, and their presence no doubt raised  the collective blood pressure and heart rate of those who overcame their fear  and braved their way to the theater.

Fight or flight, or an outpouring of stress hormones, is intended as a  life-saving response to imminent danger. There is a moment when most animals  freeze, and then are stirred by their hormones (epinephrine, norepinephrine,  followed by cortisol) to action; either to attack the danger, or to flee from  it. Fight or flight served the survivors of the Colorado shootings well.

But it is not productive for those of us who watch the news on TV, who have a  strong emotional response of empathy for the victims followed by fear for  ourselves. We are attaching ourselves voyeuristically to the news and  over-personalizing it. We become afraid to go to the movies, though the  statistical risk of anything happening to us remains extremely low.

Fear is not only very powerful, emanating from a deep emotional center of our  brain known as the amygdala, it is also highly contagious, spreading among us  and to our children as we discuss movie theaters as if they are now suddenly a  real risk. The news media, including the Internet and 24 hour cable news  coverage, stokes these fears until they deteriorate into a cycle of worry.

Post Continues on www.foxnews.com


Tagged with